|
John,
As far as I know, the nominal capacity and EIR
numbers are as you say - 100% load, 44/85.
The default curves for modifying the capacity and
EIR as functions of CHW and CW temperature will return a value of 1.00 at 44 and
85. What DOE does is use the hourly values for CHW and CW temp and then
multiplies the nominal EIR and capacity by the results of the other
formulae. For example, if you are modeling CW reset, and your CW temp goes
down in the spring or fall, then the vaule of the EIR f(CHW, CW) formula will
return less than 1 in these conditions, and the value of capacity f (CHW, CW)
will be greater than 1.
If you are modeling a system where CHW temp is
always 44 and CW temp is always 85, then you don't need to mess around with the
formulae that are based on CHW and CW temp. However, I would use actual
mfgr data for the chiller performance as a function of PLR, especially if you
are modeling a rotary screw chiller or a chiller with a VFD.
If you are modeling CHW and CW temps other than
44/85, I would also get mfgr data on the chiller performance at other points and
use the data to create new coefficients for the curves. I recently did a
job where we were modeling a rotary chiller as the base case and a VFD-driven
centrifugal with CW reset and 48 F CHW along with free cooling in the winter as
the proposed case. So I created and debugged all kinds of curves and
coefficients for that job.
If you would like any more info on creating new
curves, I can give you some tips on that - let me know.
I would also be interested in hearing what others
in the group have to say on this topic - if you can forward me any other
responses you have gotten, I would appreciate it.
Sincerely, ----- Original Message -----
=====================================================You received this e-mail because you are subscribed to the BLDG-SIM@xxxxxxxx mailing list. To unsubscribe from this mailing list send a blank message to BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE@xxxxxxxx |