|
Hello:
We've
got data on lots of pumps...including the REJ building, where the whole physical
plant was put up 2 stories in the air to reduce pumping power, and the cooling
towers placed directly on top of the plant to further reduce pumping energy, or
at least this was the design intent.
Jeff
8=! 8=) :=)
8=) ;=) 8=) 8=( 8=)
8=() 8=) 8=| 8=)
:=') 8=) 8=) 8=?
Jeff S. Haberl, Ph.D.,
P.E.............................jhaberl@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Professor...............................................Office Ph:
979-845-6507
Department of
Architecture...........................Lab Ph: 979-845-6065
Energy Systems
Laboratory...........................FAX: 979-862-2457
Texas A&M
University..................................77843-3581
College Station, Texas, USA...........................URL:
www-esl.tamu.edu
8=/ 8=) :=) 8=)
;=) 8=) 8=() 8=) :=)
8=) 8=! 8=) 8=? 8=)
8=) 8=0
I am looking for
information (articles, research papers, case studies) on the effect of the
location of the pump relative to a plate and frame heat exchanger in a closed
piping system. Some of the issues are (1) the vertical height of the
piping system (1000’ to 2000’), how high can you go, (2) pumping thru HX, (3)
pumping away from HX, (4) pump and HX located at bottom of system, (5) pump
and HX at top of system, and (6) pump start up. What are the issues when
the HX is replaced with other equipment such as chillers and
boilers?
Varkie
Thomas
Skidmore, Owings
& Merrill
312-360-4467
==================
You received this e-mail because you are subscribed
to the BLDG-SIM@xxxxxxxx mailing list. To unsubscribe
from this mailing list send a blank message to
BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE@xxxxxxxx
======================================================
You received this e-mail because you are subscribed
to the BLDG-SIM@xxxxxxxx mailing list. To unsubscribe
from this mailing list send a blank message to
BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE@xxxxxxxx
|