Dear Martin,
I think the findings may be correct.
First, for a TES system the leaving chilled water temperature usually will
be lower, so the COP will be deduced, but as the outside temperature is
lower, it does not deduced alot.
Second, if the TES system using brine water, i think the efficiency will
reduce more.
As our experience in some project in Hong Kong and Mainland, TES system
can only reduce electricity cost due to tariff rate rather than consumption.
I hope these comment would help.
Regards,
Ernest Tsang
Meinhardt (M&E) Ltd
Martin Yip <yipch@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear Bldg-sim Subscribers,<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns =
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
I recently simulated an air cooled chiller plant with cold water tank
thermal energy storage using DOE 2.2. I originally expected some energy
saving due to improve chiller COP at night charging the storage when
compare it with a system without storage. However, the results showed an
energy penalty of a few percentages even though hourly data actually
showed COP improvement during charging. I have already set the loss
coefficient to zero for the TES. I should be most grateful if anyone can
comment on this issue and provide some suggestion.
Thanks
Martin YIP
Engineer
EMSD, HKSAR
=====================================================You received this
e-mail because you are subscribed
to the BLDG-SIM@xxxxxxxx mailing list. To unsubscribe
from this mailing list send a blank message to
BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE@xxxxxxxx
ɹL¡B¤@©ç¨â´²¡B©_¬¥§õºû´µ¦^«H...
¥þ´ä³Ì¤j¤â¾÷¤U¸ü¤¤¤ß
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=22281/*http://hk.yahoo.com/mail_tagline/?http://mobile.yahoo.com.hk/>http://mobile.yahoo.com.hk/