[BLDG-SIM] Title 24 Vs ASHRAE 90.1-2004

Subject: [BLDG-SIM] Title 24 Vs ASHRAE 90.1-2004

From: "Vaibhav Potnis" <vaipotnis@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 04:16:39 +0530

Authentication-results: mail.gard.com smtp.mail=vaipotnis@xxxxxxxxxxx; spf=pass

Authentication-results: mail.gard.com header.from=vaipotnis@xxxxxxxxxxx; domainkeys=neutral (not signed); dkim=neutral (not signed)

Bcc:

In-reply-to: <MDAEMON-F200609251112.AA1257250pd80002133705@xxxxxxxx>

List-unsubscribe: <mailto:BLDG-SIM-Unsubscribe@GARD.COM>

Reply-to: vaipotnis@xxxxxxxxxxx

Sender: BLDG-SIM@xxxxxxxx

Raman,

I am assuming you are asking wrt LEED 2.2.

USGBC has accpeted T-24-2005 to be as stringent as ASHRAE 90.1-2004.

Vaibhav Potnis
Green Building Services, Inc.

www.greenbuildingservices.com

From: "Ramana Koti" <ramana.koti@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: ramana.koti@xxxxxxxxx
To: <BLDG-SIM@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: [BLDG-SIM] Title 24 Vs ASHRAE 90.1-2004
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:10:03 -0500

Dear all,

With regards to energy efficiency standard for an office building in California, as of today, how does Title 24 compare with ASHRAE 90.1-2004? Any commonly accepted opinion on relative stringency?

Thanks,

Ramana Koti, Sustainable Building Analyst
LEED AP

ELEMENTS | a division of berkebile nelson immenschuh mcdowell architects
106 W. 14th Street Suite 200
Kansas City, Missouri 64105

p 816.783.1635 f 816.783.1501
www.bnim.com| elements.bnim.com

Mobile Phone: 480.326.9275

====================================================== You received this e-mail because you are subscribed to the BLDG-SIM@xxxxxxxx mailing list. To unsubscribe from this mailing list send a blank message to BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE@xxxxxxxx