[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[BLDG-SIM] Title 24 Vs ASHRAE 90.1-2004

To: <BLDG-SIM@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: [BLDG-SIM] Title 24 Vs ASHRAE 90.1-2004
From: "Ramana Koti" <ramana.koti@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:10:03 -0500
Authentication-results: mail.gard.com smtp.mail=ramana.koti@xxxxxxxxx; spf=pass
Authentication-results: mail.gard.com header.from=ramana.koti@xxxxxxxxx; domainkeys=pass (good); dkim=neutral (not signed)
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:BLDG-SIM-Unsubscribe@GARD.COM>
Reply-to: ramana.koti@xxxxxxxxx
Sender: BLDG-SIM@xxxxxxxx

Dear all,

With regards to energy efficiency standard for an office building in California, as of today, how does Title 24 compare with ASHRAE 90.1-2004? Any commonly accepted opinion on relative stringency?

Thanks,

Ramana Koti, Sustainable Building Analyst
LEED AP

ELEMENTS | a division of berkebile nelson immenschuh mcdowell architects
106 W. 14th Street Suite 200
Kansas City, Missouri 64105

p 816.783.1635 f 816.783.1501
www.bnim.com| elements.bnim.com

Mobile Phone: 480.326.9275

Prev by Date: [BLDG-SIM]
Next by Date: [BLDG-SIM] VisualDOE 4.1 Approved for IRS Tax Credit in EPACT 2005 for Commercial Buildings
Previous by thread: [BLDG-SIM] CO2 Sensors in eQuest
Next by thread: [BLDG-SIM] Title 24 Vs ASHRAE 90.1-2004
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread