|
I’m trying to use eQuest to compare an Underfloor Air System
and conventional VAV system. I have modeled the Underfloor case according
to the Addison/Nall paper, and am having some issues with the return air
temperatures. I have modeled two stratified zones (a lower occupied 5’
zone, and an upper 8’ plenum space). A portion of the internal
gains and window conduction is modeled in the plenum space, and the return air
path is set to PLENUM. I expected a portion of the cooling loads to be
transferred to the return air, raising the return air temperatures, and allowed
the loads in the occupied zone to be met with a higher supply air temp (SAT). However, when I increase my SAT for the underfloor case, my
cfm and fan energy increases accordingly. I output hourly return air
temps for the two cases and found that they were the same – adding heat
gains to the plenum space did not increase the return air temps. Further,
I adjusted my heating and cooling setpoints for the zones, and found that the return
air temps are equal to these zonal setpoints, regardless of what load is
imposed on the plenum spaces. Has anyone experienced this problem? Thanks! Kendra Kendra Tupper
=====================================================You received this e-mail because you are subscribed to the BLDG-SIM@xxxxxxxx mailing list. To unsubscribe from this mailing list send a blank message to BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE@xxxxxxxx |