[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bldg-sim] Comparing ASHRAE 90.1 2004 with ASHRAE 90.1 1999

To: <bldg-sim@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: [bldg-sim] Comparing ASHRAE 90.1 2004 with ASHRAE 90.1 1999
From: Jaya Mukhopadhyay <jaya_mukho@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 07:28:54 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-results: mail.gard.com smtp.mail=jaya_mukho@xxxxxxxxx; spf=neutral
Authentication-results: mail.gard.com header.from=jaya_mukho@xxxxxxxxx; domainkeys=pass (good); dkim=neutral (not signed)
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:bldg-sim-Unsubscribe@gard.com>
Reply-to: jaya_mukho@xxxxxxxxx
Sender: bldg-sim@xxxxxxxx

We are trying to put together a comparison analysis of ASHRAE 90.1 2004 with the current City of Houston standard (IECC 2000 with 2001 amendments / ASHRAE 90.1 1999). By presenting this analysis we hope to point out that ASHRAE 90.1 2004 is more stringent than the current energy code options. Any suggestions as to how we can choose our base case specifications?

Dr. Haberl, Are you tuned in?

Thanks

Jaya Mukhopadhyay

Need a quick answer? Get one in minutes from people who know. Ask your question on Yahoo! Answers.

Prev by Date: [bldg-sim] creating budget cases
Next by Date: [BLDG-SIM] IBPSA News, Vol. 17, No. 1 -- April 2007
Previous by thread: [BLDG-SIM] Call for Papers -- How Low Can You Go? Case Studies of Low-Energy Buildings ASHRAE
Next by thread: [bldg-sim] Comparing ASHRAE 90.1 2004 with ASHRAE 90.1 1999
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread